Promoting skepticism and reason without boundaries or sacred cows.
LOS ANGELES — O.J. Simpson will tell FOX "how he would have committed" the slayings of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman in an interview to air later this month.

Simpson, who was acquitted of the crimes in a 1994 criminal trial, agreed to an "unrestricted" interview with book publisher Judith Regan. The two-part interview, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened," will air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29.

"O.J. Simpson, in his own words, tells for the first time how he would have committed the murders if he were the one responsible for the crimes," FOX said in a statement. "In the two-part event, Simpson describes how he would have carried out the murders he has vehemently denied committing for over a decade."


Why is he even considering it? What a moron.


Comments
on Nov 15, 2006
You know...when you're acquitted of murder it's best just to stay the hell away from anything relating to it...although, he could just as well confess and no one could do a damn thing. Double jeopardy.

~Zoo
on Nov 15, 2006
Why is he even considering it? What a moron


Money, money, money, money....MONEY! Seriously. Oh, and FAME!
on Nov 15, 2006
he could just as well confess and no one could do a damn thing. Double jeopardy.


Maybe this is a sort of confession.

Money, money, money, money....MONEY! Seriously. Oh, and FAME!


I meant why is he considering how to kill them.
on Nov 15, 2006

Money, money, money, money....MONEY! Seriously. Oh, and FAME!

Yep!

on Nov 15, 2006

I meant why is he considering how to kill them.

Not considering, Opining.  And because we all have at one time or another, but no one wants to hear our opinions on it.

on Nov 15, 2006
OJ, IMHO, is famous for nothing more than costing the American taxpayers more than any individual ever, and for making a complete and utter mockery out of the judicial system.

Why he would do it, I could really care less.

Am I glad he is? Yes. Why? Hopefully he will put his foot in his mouth, and they will find something to charge him with.
on Nov 15, 2006
OJ, IMHO, is famous for nothing more than costing the American taxpayers more than any individual ever, and for making a complete and utter mockery out of the judicial system.


No, he was the first back to gain over 2000 yards rushing in a season.

I hate when we ignore an accomplishment because of future deeds. I detest Pete Rose (I am a Mets fan and have not forgiven him for spiking Bud Harrelson). But to deny their accomplishments for actions after the fact is tantamount to rewriting history ala the old USSR.

Sorry, hate him for his future deeds, but do not take away what he accomplished.
on Nov 18, 2006
How about that Judith Regan gal? Ain't she a winner? What a true and unequivicoalsfwu professional. Run that one through your spell checker Judith.