Promoting skepticism and reason without boundaries or sacred cows.
Or: The Uptight Morons Always Get Their Way
Published on November 15, 2006 By Ionolast In Current Events
Emily Gillette, 27, of Santa Fe, N.M., filed the complaint with the Vermont Human Rights Commission late last week against Delta Air Lines and Freedom Airlines, said her attorney, Elizabeth Boepple. Freedom was operating the Delta flight between Burlington and New York City.

Gillette said she was discreetly breast-feeding her 22-month-old daughter on Oct. 13 as their flight prepared to leave Burlington International Airport. She said she was seated by the window in the next-to-last row, her husband was seated between her and the aisle and no part of her breast was showing.

A flight attendant tried to hand her a blanket and told her to cover up, Gillette said. She declined, telling the flight attendant she had a legal right to breast-feed her baby.

Moments later, a Delta ticket agent approached and said the flight attendant had asked that the family be removed from the flight, Gillette said. She said she didn't want to make a scene and complied.

"A breast-feeding mother is perfectly acceptable on an aircraft, providing she is feeding the child in a discreet way,"that doesn't bother others, said Paul Skellon, spokesman for Phoenix-based Freedom

In a discreet way that doesn't bother others? What others, uptight religious assholes? I am so sick of the immature attitude about the human body in this country. It wasn't even a sexual thing.

Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Nov 15, 2006
We are forced to accomodate all the others out there when they flout their morals in our faces, why not the prudish?  I dont think it was unreasonable to ask her to be discrete.  if it was an imposition, that would have been one thing.  But a blanket is an imposition?
on Nov 15, 2006
We are forced to accomodate all the others out there when they flout their morals in our faces, why not the prudish?


Because prudishness is immature. This is the 21st century, not the 19th. As I said, she wasn't displaying her breast for sexual reasons. If someone can't handle the sight of a breast when a baby is feeding, they're the ones with a problem. From what the report says here:


"She said she was seated by the window in the next-to-last row, her husband was seated between her and the aisle and no part of her breast was showing."

I think that was enough discretion.
on Nov 15, 2006

Because prudishness is immature.

My mother would disagree with you, as would my grandmother.  Respecting someone's sensibilities is what the 21st century is all about.  Are you saying that it is only ok to respect some sensibilities and not others?  And then who decides which to respect.

BTW:  I dont know how many flights you have been on, but the bathrooms are in the back and you get a full frontal walking down the aisle.

on Nov 15, 2006
Respecting someone's sensibilities is what the 21st century is all about.


In other words, political correctness. Unfortunantely, a lot of people are de-evolving.

Are you saying that it is only ok to respect some sensibilities and not others? And then who decides which to respect.


They have the right to their opinion, but if their opinion is outdated, it shouldn't count for shit.
on Nov 15, 2006
I think I met that woman when I lived in Santa Fe . . . I could almost swear that I did! I even think I have a picture of her somewhere . . .

And if it is who I think it is . . . the flight attendant was just jealous.

Oh, and by the way, I love the fact that you include this:

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


on Nov 15, 2006
And if it is who I think it is . . . the flight attendant was just jealous.


Have you seen the attendant?  

Oh, and by the way, I love the fact that you include this:


Some people here get upset if you don't give credit where credit is due.
on Nov 15, 2006
They have the right to their opinion, but if their opinion is outdated, it shouldn't count for shit.


At least you are consistent. And very non-PC!
on Nov 15, 2006
At least you are consistent. And very non-PC!


Thanks. I think "outdated" might have been a bad choice of words. Maybe "prudish" is better.
on Nov 15, 2006
I defend a woman's right to breastfeed in public, but there is NO excuse to display any part of the breast while doing so. I know women who breastfeed in church, in the chapel, and you would have to be looking awful close to even realize she's doing it.

But more to the point. This woman was apparently being discreet. If so, then she has a very strong case against Delta Airlines, and I hope she sues the shirt off their backs!

And don't go throwing that "religion" crap around, it's as tiresome as the whole "should she or shouldn't she" question about discreet breastfeeding.
on Nov 15, 2006
And don't go throwing that "religion" crap around, it's as tiresome as the whole "should she or shouldn't she" question about discreet breastfeeding.


You're saying there are prudes who don't base their opinions on religion?
on Nov 15, 2006

Iconoclast -

In keeping with the IP desires of the Associated Press (which you included in the post at the bottom).  Please condense the article to a synopsis and provide a link to the full one.  It explicitly states that the article may not be redistributed, which you have done here in your post.

on Nov 15, 2006
I think a woman in her twenties should be able to flop her breasts out anywhere(preferably in my vicinity )....but, that's just me.

~Zoo
on Nov 15, 2006
Done, Zoomba.
on Nov 15, 2006
I think a woman in her twenties should be able to flop her breasts out anywhere(preferably in my vicinity )....but, that's just me.


Not only you.
on Nov 15, 2006
This is about as stupid as the 10 year-old kid that got suspended from school, because he asked his teacher for a hug. Link

It's falling apart at a pretty good rate these days.
3 Pages1 2 3