Ann Coulter is an Asshole

Published on June 8, 2006 By Ionolast In Current Events

NEW YORK - Conservative pundit Ann Coulter was front page news Wednesday for what she's written about some 9/11 widows:

"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities," writes Coulter.

She's also under fire for what she said Tuesday in an interview with the "Today" show's Matt Lauer.

"If you lose a husband, you no longer have the right to have a political point of view?" asked Lauer.

"No, but don't use the fact that you lost a husband as the basis for your being able to talk about it," Coulter responded.

Coulter was on the "Today" show to push her latest anti-liberal book, "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," already an Amazon.com best seller.

But the interview kept returning to Coulter's attacks on the 9/11 widows. She called them "harpies" and wondered in print whether their husbands had been planning to divorce them.

A statement from four of the widows says: "There was no joy in watching men that we loved burn alive. There was no happiness in telling our children that their fathers were never coming home again. We adored these men and miss them every day."

Coulter says she believes everything she says and writes, but has she gone too far?

"It's the ugliness of the charge that she's making and the ugliness of the words she's using that are drawing attention to her, but it's almost like she’s a figure in a circus and you say, 'Oh my God, can you believe that?'" says former White House adviser David Gergen.

Still, the tempest was a trigger for a red/blue debate on MSNBC TV with criticism for Coulter from both sides.

"I think it was shameful what she said, Chris, but I think these widows have attacked President Bush," Dom Giordano, a conservative talk show host with radio station WPHT, told "Hardball's" Chris Matthews.

"I think she’s a sad, pathetic, unhappy person," said liberal counter-voice Sam Greenfield, a talk show host with radio station WWRL.

All of it fallout from a television exchange likely to be remembered well beyond the impact of a few ill-tempered sentences in print.

© 2006 MSNBC Interactive

Even if she doesn't really mean those things and only said them to spark controversy and sell more books, are the people she insulted going to forgive her when she says, "I only did it because I'm a greedy bitch?"

Links to more of the story

Link

Link

Comments (Page 1)

bakerstreet

on Jun 08, 2006

She goes too far, I'll give you that, but she has a valid point that posts like yours (purposely) overlook. The point about the 9/11 wives and Cindy Sheehan and such is that debating them is off limits. Unless you lost someone the way they did you can't sit and debate their political philosophy without being the villain.

I agree with her 100%. American quasi-Liberals do it all the time with the war, where they spout that if you aren't willing to go and die you can't support the war, and then in the same breath vilify such attitudes when they have to deal with them. You see the back-and-forth here when someone says that unless you are willing to do what soldiers do you can't differ with the job they are doing.

The anti-Conservatives want it both ways, as usual. They want to be able to parade their victims with a memorized series of talking points, and then when someone like Ann Coulter takes them to task they start waving the bloody shirt. I listened to an interview with her and the snippets that have caused the uproar, and people are really making it into something it isn't.

I don't like the statement she made about divorce stuff, but this is someone who has to deal with the most disgusting attacks on her whether she says things like that or not. She's not calling them 'little eichmanns', anyway, she's simply saying that hiding behind the victims of war or terrorism to shield your political opinion is cowardly.

Sheehan stated in one of her disgruntled letters to the press that there would never be a good discussion of the war in Iraq so long as there were dissenting opinions there clouding the subject. That's the attitude that Coulter, and many of us, are angry about. It isn't that we are wrong, but it isn't even tasteful to SAY what we think in the presence of these fragile flowers.

Well, if they are fragile, they don't need to be out there provoking a debate they don't want to take part in.

-----

on Jun 08, 2006

I think shee had a good point, as Baker said. Still, she stepped over the line. There is only so far you can go with what you have to say until you get to the point where you go from, "your opinion," to "a$$h--e."

Ionolast

on Jun 08, 2006

she has a valid point that posts like yours (purposely) overlook.

I posted links to the entire story. The title is because she went too far. I think she could have made her point without being an asshole.

this is someone who has to deal with the most disgusting attacks on her whether she says things like that or not.

So she did it for revenge?

Cordelia

on Jun 08, 2006

You are welcome to write about whatever you like but please remove the offending word from the title of this post. Thanks very much. [Stardock Admin.]

Dr Guy

on Jun 08, 2006

Reply By: BakerStreet

Stated very well. Have a cookie.

bakerstreet

on Jun 08, 2006

Revenge, sure. Did you call her a cunt out of revenge? You could take a minute and hit the wacko-Dem boards and see how she is talked about, and then imagine being in her shoes, having to sit alongside these women on interview shows as they are treated like brave little patriots who expect their political assertions to be shielded by their pain.

I'd be mad too. I don't think she'll score any political points by hitting soft targets like this, but she didn't make them targets. When they drag the bloody shirt to every TV show, and make their pain their selling point, THEY are the ones that make their experiences a valid topic for discussion.

Ionolast

on Jun 08, 2006

You could take a minute and hit the wacko-Dem boards and see how she is talked about, and then imagine being in her shoes, having to sit alongside these women on interview shows as they are treated like brave little patriots who expect their political assertions to be shielded by their pain.

She's not proving herself to be better than they are.

bakerstreet

on Jun 08, 2006

No, but obviously you consider her somehow worse, given I've never seen a blog of yours calling the Dems who walk roughshod over political bystanders. When all the little Dem bobbleheads say nasty things about the military, you don't see this kind of outrage from the Left. I don't remember a leftist feeding frenzy when Ward Churchill called these women's husbands "little eichmanns".

There's an edititorial SLAMMING Coulter right now on Fox News' website. I wonder, do you see that kind of self-reflection on the left? Hardly. Go back and look at a lot of the things that were said on memorial day. I think you'll find an imbalance of outrage in the media when pundits go for soft targets.

Ionolast

on Jun 08, 2006

I've never seen a blog of yours calling the Dems who walk roughshod over political bystanders.

How many blogs of mine have you seen that are political? This one is not meant to be political. It's only about her attitude.

Ionolast

on Jun 08, 2006

"I've never seen people enjoy their husbands' deaths so much,"

Not even Anna Nicole Smith?

bakerstreet

on Jun 08, 2006

Lucky for you that you ended up being motivated by an ultra-conservative, then. No doubt had been anyone of any other political bent you would have commented with the same fervor and eloquence. What a happy coincidence...

ParaTed2k

on Jun 08, 2006

ok, I don't get it.

We cried and mourned with all the families of the attacks of Sep 11th. We sent them money and made sure and did what we could to soften the terrible tragedy they suffered through. After all, anything we suffered as a result of those attacks were infinitly worse for them. In every way our hearts went out to them...

But...

How does their suffering make them experts on anything? If they are writing books on dealing with tragic loss, yeah, I could see where their experiences gives them insight that most of the rest of us are lacking. However, how does their suffering make them authorities on how to deal with terrorism?

What if some of these widows were separated from their husbands? What if a few were cheating on them? What if they hadn't spoken to their dearly departed in a long time?

These women are not heroes in the same way the Firefighters, EMTs and Police were on that day. They are worthy of our respect for living through that kind of hell and surviving to tell about it... so let them tell us about it... but when they hit the talk show circuit, I don't hear much about how they overcame hardship.... All I hear is them telling me that I should listen to their political rants because THEY SUFFERED.

Harpies may not be a fitting word for them... but neither is "expert".

Ionolast

on Jun 08, 2006

What if some of these widows were separated from their husbands? What if a few were cheating on them? What if they hadn't spoken to their dearly departed in a long time?

Where's the proof?

Is Coulter an expert on dealing with tragic loss?

Dr Guy

on Jun 08, 2006

How does their suffering make them experts on anything?

For the Victims (democrats) it makes them experts on suffering of course. Pish Posh on the money! The guy who just got whacked by an illegal immigrant? Tough luck Sally! He was not killed by the correct illegal immigrant! It is all about race. Get killed by the right race, and you are a victim! Capital V. Get whacked by the wrong one? Hey! That is life!

stutefish

on Jun 08, 2006

It's my theory that emotions are excellent for telling you that something has to be done, but that emotions suck for telling you what has to be done, and why.

So I'm totally unimpressed by arguments based on the idea that it's okay if your thinking is weak, so long as your feelings are strong.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!